Picocleaning is 10 to 12th cleaning or 1 million times smaller than today surfactants and soaps at 10 to 6th
There are no true sanitizer or sterilizer for virus's unless they are 10 to 12th.
There can be no long duration space flight without picocleaning, As the undected millions of virus's 125 nm will kill the travelers!
Micro cracks are unit prefix in the metric system denoting a factor of 10 6th.


Pico Atomic Cleaning Inc. Donald Wilshe, 5731 Lexington Drive, Parrish, Fl 34219 336-306-0193 donwilshe@biobased.us

Test 1 Oil Soil Remediation: Pico-Clean removed TRPH (o-Terpheny C18H14 & n-Triacontane C30H62) 99.997%
Except for 38Mg/Kg / 9680Mg/Kg = only .00392562%. in Pass 1 at Site!
Tested At PhosLab Environmental Laboratories, Phone: (863) 588-7384


Test 2 Oil and Starch Remediation compared to d-Limonene follows: University of Mass USA / Biobased USA Pico Clean Toxic Use Reduction Institute (TURI) Surface Solutions Laboratory Oil Starch Evaluation Summary last 5 pages!

Test 3 Chlorine and Bleach Equal Lab report tested our product Pico Clean against Chlorine and Bleach and it cleaned Equally, You can drink our product but I wont recommend drink Clorox.

Test 4 Biobased USA Southern California Air Quality Lab Report No GWC Global Warming, No ODC No Ozone Depleting, No VOHAP, and just VOC 20 g/l

Test 5 Biobased USA SGS Results Harmless to Skin and No Negative Reaction

Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Testing

















UNIV MASS TURI SURFACE SOLUTIONS LABORATORY OIL STARCH EVALUATION SUMMARY TEST 2-1

SCL #: 2004-12-234-0-2
Date Run: 12/1/2004
Experimenters: Marshall
Client Type: 43
Project Number: 1
Substrates: Stainless Steel
Part Type: 2
Contaminants: Oil
Cleaning Methods: Immersion/Soak
Analytical Methods Gravimetric;
Purpose: To evaluate alternative cleaning products for removing cotton seed oil/starch mix.
Experimental Procedure Six products were selected from the laboratory's database of test results and vendor supplied information based on client specific needs. Each product was diluted with DI water to vendor suggested concentration. The products were then heated to 130 F on a hot plate.

Eighteen preweighed stainless steel coupons were coated with the supplied cotton seed oil/starch mix and allowed to sit
for 24 hours. Coupons were then weighed a second time to determine the amount of soil that was added. Three coupons
were cleaned in each product for five minutes using stir bar agitation. Cleaning was followed by a 15 second rinse in a
tap water bath at 120 F and air blow off for 30 seconds at room temperature. Once dry, coupons were weighed a third
time and efficiencies were calculated for each product tested.

Chemistries Evaluated: H2Orange2, SC Oven, VPW SC, Pico Cleaner, Super H2O2

Results: Five of the six products consistently removed over 90% of the cotton seed oil/starch mix. Biobased USA's Pico Cleaner-, Commercial cleaner removed over 98% of the oil in the five minutes of cleaning at 130 F. The table below, lists the amount of soil added, the amount remaining and the percent removed for each coupon cleaned.

Cleaner--------Init-wt------Final-wt---% Removed
H2Orange2----0.0452-----0.0253-------44.03
------------------0.3792-----0.0369-------90.27
------------------0.4445-----0.0505-------88.64
SC Oven-------0.3745-----0.0151-------95.97
------------------0.3088-----0.0155-------94.98
------------------0.0789-----0.0077-------90.24
VPW SC-------0.4447-----0.0103-------97.68
------------------0.4194-----0.0220-------94.75
------------------0.0470-----0.0007-------98.51
Pico Cleaner---0.0468-----0.0015-------96.79
------------------0.4464-----0.0063-------98.59
------------------0.3393-----0.0039-------98.85
Super H2O2---0.4204-----0.0093-------97.79
------------------0.3474-----0.0149-------95.71
------------------0.5575-----0.0276-------95.05

Summary Substrates:Stainless Steel
Contaminants: Oil

Company-------------Product---------Efficiency----Effective

EnvirOx LLC---------H2Orange2-----74.31----------No
Gemtek Products-----SC Oven--------93.73----------Yes
Orison Marketing----VPW SC--------96.98----------Yes
Biobased USA--------Pico Cleaner---98.07----------Yes--#1
Cleanline--------------Super H2O2----96.18----------Yes

Conclusion: The five effective cleaners will be tested on the coupons that have been contaminated at the client's site in their processing equipment.


UNIV MASS TURI SURFACE SOLUTIONS LABORATORY OIL STARCH EVALUATION SUMMARY TEST 5-4

SCL #: 2004-12-233-5-4
Date Run: 12/2/2004
Experimenters: Marshall
Client Type: General Mfr
Project Number: 1
Substrates: Stainless Steel
Part Type: Coupons
Contaminants: Oil, Strach
Cleaning Methods: Immersion/Soak
Analytical Methods Gravimetric;
Purpose: To evaluate products at an elevated temperature and longer cleaning time.
Experimental Procedure The Five products were selected baed on test from the previous trail. Each product was diluted with DI water to vendor suggested concentration. The products were then heated to 130 F on a hot plate.
The pre-contaminated stainless steel coupons were cleaned three coupons per product for another 10 minutes (15 total) using stir bar agitation. Cleaning was followed by a 15 second rinse in tap water bath at 120F and air blow off for 30 seconds at room temperature. Once dry, coupons were weighed a third time and efficiencies were calculated for each product tested.

Chemistries Evaluated: VPW SC, Pico Cleaner, Super H2O2

Results: All three products removed over 75% of the oil/starch, mix after 30 minutes of cleaning at 160F One of the products. Biobased USA's Pico Cleaner removed over 95%, the table below lists the amount the soil added, The amount remaining and the percent removed for each coupon.

Cleaner--------Init-wt------Final-wt---% Removed
SC Oven-------0.0383-----0.0469-------- -22.45
------------------0.0616-----0.0370-------40.13
------------------0.1409-----0.0386-------58.41
VPW SC-------0.0799-----0.0380-------53.94
------------------0.1641-----0.0863-------47.41
------------------0.0563-----0.0540-------4.09
Pico Cleaner---0.0477-----0.0099-------79.25
------------------0.1354-----0.0292-------78.43
------------------0.0785-----0.0079-------89.94
Super H2O2---0.1265-----0.0243-------80.73
------------------0.0841-----0.0236-------71.94
------------------0.1771-----0.0921-------48.00

Summary Substrates:Stainless Steel
Contaminants: Oil

Company-------------Product---------Efficiency----Effective

Gemtek----------------SC Oven--------25.36----------No
Orison-----------------VPW SC--------35.15----------No
Biobased USA--------Pico Cleaner---82.54----------Yes--#1
Cleanline--------------Super H2O2----66.89----------Yes

Conclusion: All four products will be cleaned for an additoanl 15 minutes (30 minutes total) All other conditions will be kept the same.


UNIV MASS TURI SURFACE SOLUTIONS LABORATORY OIL STARCH EVALUATION SUMMARY TEST 3-4

SCL #: 2004-12-233-3-4
Date Run: 12/2/2004
Experimenters: Marshall
Client Type: General Mfr
Project Number: 1
Substrates: Stainless Steel
Part Type: Coupons
Contaminants: Oil, Strach
Cleaning Methods: Immersion/Soak
Analytical Methods Gravimetric;
Purpose: To evaluate products at a longer cleaning time.
Experimental Procedure: The Five products were selected based on test from the previous trail. Each product was diluted with DI water to vendor suggested concentration. The products were then heated to 130 F on a hot plate.
The pre-contaminated stainless steel coupons were cleaned three coupons per product for another 15 minutes (30 total) using stir bar agitation. Cleaning was followed by a 15 second rinse in tap water bath at 120F and air blow off for 30 seconds at room temperature. Once dry, coupons were weighed a third time and efficiencies were calculated for each product tested.

Chemistries Evaluated: VPW SC, Pico Cleaner, Super H2O2

Results: All three products removed over 75% of the oil/starch, mix after 30 minutes of cleaning at 160F One of the products. Biobased USA's Pico Cleaner removed over 95%, the table below lists the amount the soil added, The amount remaining and the percent removed for each coupon.

Cleaner--------Init-wt------Final-wt--% Removed
SC Oven-------0.0383-----0.0427------ -11.49
------------------0.0616-----0.0340-------44.98
------------------0.1409-----0.0457-------62.08
VPW SC-------0.0799-----0.0303-------80.66
------------------0.1641-----0.0317-------26.82
------------------0.0563-----0.0540-------4.09
Pico Cleaner---0.0477-----0.0065-------86.37
------------------0.1354-----0.0292-------88.63
------------------0.0785-----0.0079-------96.05
Super H2O2---0.1261-----0.0199-------84.22
------------------0.0841-----0.0193-------77.05
------------------0.1771-----0.0522-------70.53

Summary Substrates:Stainless Steel
Contaminants: Oil

Company-------------Product---------Efficiency----Effective

Gemtek-----------------SC Oven---------33.36----------No
Orison------------------VPW SC---------56.53----------No
Biobased USA--------Pico Cleaner-----90.36----------Yes--#1
Cleanline--------------Super H2O2------77.27----------Yes

Conclusion: All four products will be cleaned for an additoanl 15 minutes (30 minutes total) All other conditions will be kept the same. at the client's site in their processing equipment.
< br>
UNIV MASS TURI SURFACE SOLUTIONS LABORATORY OIL STARCH EVALUATION SUMMARY TEST 4-4

SCL #: 2004-12-233-4-4
Date Run: 12/2/2004
Experimenters: Marshall
Client Type: General Mfr
Project Number: 1
Substrates: Stainless Steel
Part Type: Coupons
Contaminants: Oil, Strach
Cleaning Methods: Immersion/Soak
Analytical Methods Gravimetric;
Purpose: To evaluate products at a higher temperature.
Experimental Procedure Four products were selected from the previous trail. Each product with DI water to vendor suggested concentration. The products were then heated to 160 F on a hot plate. Twelve of the pre-contaminated stainless steel coupons were cleaned, three coupons per product for 15 minutes using stir bar agitation. Cleaning was followed by a 15 second rinse in tap water bath at 120 F and air blow off for 30 seconds at room temperature. Once dry, Coupons were weighed a third time and efficiencies were calculated for each product tested.

Chemistries Evaluated: VPW SC, Pico Cleaner, Super H2O2

Results: Three of the four products were all more effective at the higher temperature for the same cleaning time (15 minutes) Only the Biobased USA's Pico Cleaner had a lower effciency than at 130F. (A difference of 7%). One of the products removed over 85% of the oil/starch mix. The table below lists the amount of soil added, the amount remaining and the percent for each coupon cleaned.

Cleaner--------Init-wt------Final-wt---% Removed
VPW SC-------0.1596-----0.0875-------45.16
------------------0.0611-----0.0386-------36.62
------------------0.1829-----0.0715-------60.91
Pico Cleaner---0.0945-----0.0130-------86.24
------------------0.1665-----0.0138-------91.71
------------------0.0547-----0.0091-------83.36
Super H2O2---0.0716-----0.0226-------68.44
------------------0.1511-----0.0257-------82.99
------------------0.0794-----0.0191-------75.94

Summary Substrates:Stainless Steel
Contaminants: Oil

Company-------------Product---------Efficiency----Effective

Orison-----------------VPW SC--------47.64----------Yes
Biobased USA--------Pico Cleaner---87.11----------Yes--#1
Cleanline--------------Super H2O2----75.79----------Yes

Conclusion: All Four products will be cleaned for an additional 15 minutes (30 Minutes Total) All other conditions will be kept the same.


UNIV MASS TURI SURFACE SOLUTIONS LABORATORY OIL STARCH EVALUATION SUMMARY TEST 2-4

SCL #: 2004-12-233-5-4
Date Run: 12/2/2004
Experimenters: Marshall
Client Type: General Mfr
Project Number: 1
Substrates: Stainless Steel
Part Type: Coupons
Contaminants: Oil, Strach
Cleaning Methods: Immersion/Soak
Analytical Methods Gravimetric;
Purpose: To evaluate products at an elevated temperature and longer cleaning time.
Experimental Procedure The four products from the previous trail with DI water to vendor suggested concentration. The products were then heated to 160 F on a hot plate.
The pre-contaminated stainless steel coupons were cleaned three coupons per product for another 15 minutes (30 minutes total) using stir bar agitation. Cleaning was followed by a 15 second rinse in tap water bath at 120 F and air blow off for 30 seconds at room temperature. Once dry, coupons were weighed a third time and efficiencies were calculated for each product tested.

Chemistries Evaluated: VPW SC, Pico Cleaner, Super H2O2

Results: All three products removed over 75% of the oil/starch, mix after 30 minutes of cleaning at 160F One of the products. Biobased USA's Pico Cleaner removed over 95%, the table below lists the amount the soil added, The amount remaining and the percent removed for each coupon.

Cleaner--------Init-wt------Final-wt---% Removed
VPW SC-------0.1596-----0.0380-------76.19
------------------0.0611-----0.0226-------63.01
------------------0.1829-----0.0216-------88.19
Pico Cleaner---0.0945-----0.0036-------96.19
------------------0.1665-----0.0049-------97.06
------------------0.0547-----0.0035-------93.80
Super H2O2---0.0716-----0.0098-------86.31
------------------0.1511-----0.0102-------93.25
------------------0.0974-----0.0115-------85.52

Summary Substrates:Stainless Steel
Contaminants: Oil

Company-------------Product---------Efficiency----Effective

Orison-----------------VPW SC--------75.80----------Yes
Biobased USA--------Pico Cleaner---95.36----------Yes--#1
Cleanline--------------Super H2O2----88.36----------Yes

Conclusion: The five effective cleaners will be tested on the coupons that have been contaminated


Biobased USA Pico Clean Chlorine / Bleach Equal Test 3

Biobased USA Southern California Air Quality Test 4 No GWC, No ODC, No VOHAP, Little VOC 20 g/l

Biobased USA Test 5 SGS Results Harmless to Skin and No Negative Reaction.


I would not take a science class in a university for free, It will dummy down you and you never recover!


Thomas Cardinal Wolsey 1471-1530 Said! “Be very, very careful what you put in that head, because you will never, ever get it out. You will have lost the ability for critical thought and questioning, and just be part of some industries wanted brain washed "GROUP THINKERS". Knowing nothing when you thought you new everything!

Thomas Cardinal Wolsey 1471-1530 Said! “Be very, very careful what you put in that head, because you will never, ever get it out.
You might have lost the ability to "UNLEARN", "Critical Thought", "Questioning". "GROUP THINKING" Creates the biggest loss to mankind,
Beware of Science!


Are you from China 100+ daily visitors? No Calls or Emails or I will block the country. WhatsApp 336-306-0193

www.ebook-femtotechnology-agriculture-may-2021-uspto-10994999.com/
www.ebook-femtotechnology-medicines-may-2021-uspto-11000541.com/
www.biobased.us/!-Cleaning-Patent/specs_TUP63751.pdf
www.americas-epa-approved-pesticides-farming-land.com
www.african-asian-agriculture.com
www.agri-safe.com
www.animal-feed-dry-matter.com
www.atomic-agriculture.com
www.atomic-medicine.com
www.bio-logicals.com
www.basis-of-technology.com
www.bio-logicals.com
www.biobased.us
www.biopesticides.us
www.biorationals.com
www.carbon-atom-mining.com
www.caribbean-agriculture.com
www.clavibacter-michiganensis.com
www.epa-25b.com
www.femto-agriculture.com
www.femtoag.com
www.femto-cides.com
www.femto-clean.com
www.femto-cleaning.com
www.femto-energy.com
www.femto-medical.com
www.femto-technology.com
www.femtoag.com
www.femtoagriculture.com
www.femtocare.com
www.femtocides.com
www.femtophrama.com
www.femtotech.us
www.femtotechnology-cides.com
www.femtotechnology-medicine.com
www.femtotechnology-picotechnology-nanotechnology-microntechnology.com
www.femto-sustainability.com
www.femtotechnology.us
www.femto-technology.com
www.made-in-america.us
www.biologicals-to-atoms.com
www.molecules-to-atoms.com
www.morocco-agriculture.com
www.nomore-acm.com
www.nutures-nature.com
www.organo-phosphates.com
www.out-of-the-box.com
www.pico-medicine.com
www.pico-pesticides.com
www.pico-products.com
www.pico-technology.us
www.picoag.com
www.picocides.com
www.picocleaning.com
www.picosoap.com
www.picotech.us
www.trans-location.com
www.whra.com
Wonders-of-Plant-Growth.html
www.biobased.us/co2explained.html
Atoms%20of%20Elements%20for%20Fertilizer